7.62X54R Powder selection Question
- JohnnyEnfield
- Supporter
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 08 Dec 2017 20:24
- My Press Choice: Single Stage
- Location: Northeast USA
- Has thanked: 176 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
7.62X54R Powder selection Question
I just started some loads for 7.62X54R and I am little befuddled with the powder selections I see. I wanted to use Hodgdon Hybrid 100V for 180 grain Speer SP bullets and 167 Gr Missouri lead bullets. I have CFE 223 which has actually given decent performance in 303 British (which is what the Hybrid 100V was for originally).
The loads I made with CFE 223 in 7.62X54R have worked so far, I am still in the beginning stages of work up. I WANT to use Hybrid 100V because it SEEMS like it should work well, given the volume and burn rate, BUT Hodgdon does not provide load data for it in the 7.62X54R cartridge.
What am I missing or not understanding? Maybe I am just not thinking clearly because I have had a couple recent surgeries? Last time I looked into this (prior to actually having the brass for the Russian cartridges) I researched a bunch of different load data for several similar cartridges and came up with some preliminary numbers as start loads (that I wont show here because it is not published load data) but I am a novice and don't want to make dangerous assumptions. Why would they list data for a ton of cartridges with Hybrid 100V but not even ONE bullet weight listed for 7.62X54R? Maybe I am trying put a square peg in a round hole.
If I am out in left field, please tell me.
Thank you for any insight.
The loads I made with CFE 223 in 7.62X54R have worked so far, I am still in the beginning stages of work up. I WANT to use Hybrid 100V because it SEEMS like it should work well, given the volume and burn rate, BUT Hodgdon does not provide load data for it in the 7.62X54R cartridge.
What am I missing or not understanding? Maybe I am just not thinking clearly because I have had a couple recent surgeries? Last time I looked into this (prior to actually having the brass for the Russian cartridges) I researched a bunch of different load data for several similar cartridges and came up with some preliminary numbers as start loads (that I wont show here because it is not published load data) but I am a novice and don't want to make dangerous assumptions. Why would they list data for a ton of cartridges with Hybrid 100V but not even ONE bullet weight listed for 7.62X54R? Maybe I am trying put a square peg in a round hole.
If I am out in left field, please tell me.
Thank you for any insight.
Reduce, reuse, recycle, means- resize, reload, recycle.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 258
- Joined: 15 May 2018 16:37
- My Press Choice: Single Stage
- Location: Oregon
- Has thanked: 94 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: 7.62X54R Powder selection Question
Maybe call Hodgdon and ask if They think that Powder is suitable in that Cartridge?
Dunno, Good Luck
Dunno, Good Luck
- Ranch Dog
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: 22 Jun 2013 17:16
- My Press Choice: Progressive
- Location: Inez, TX
- Has thanked: 1617 times
- Been thanked: 2851 times
LA
Do you have a cartridge overall length that you will be using with the 180-grain Speer SP. I will run it through QuckLoad.JohnnyEnfield wrote:I just started some loads for 7.62X54R and I am little befuddled with the powder selections I see. I wanted to use Hodgdon Hybrid 100V for 180 grain Speer SP bullets and 167 Gr Missouri lead bullets.
Michael
- JohnnyEnfield
- Supporter
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 08 Dec 2017 20:24
- My Press Choice: Single Stage
- Location: Northeast USA
- Has thanked: 176 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
Re: 7.62X54R Powder selection Question
2.980 is the COL I used for my first test loads with CFE 223 and the 180 grain bullet. At that depth the bullet is not seated very far into the neck and it worked well in the 1946 M44 I am using as my test vehicle. The 167 grain bullet shape is very different (flat point, short ogive) and hit the rifling unless I put a lot of it in the case. That COL was 2.594 after adjusting away from the rifling .02. The bullet is seating way down in the case for that one. Gun seems to like those bullets, both bullets actually, at least for 25 - 30 yards.
I won't know how well they shoot until I reload a few more of each and take them out to 75 or 100 yards. I am trying to take "baby steps". My Enfield really stretches brass, and had a case head separation on the 2nd re-loading of mild loads. Good thing I bought the removal tool BEFORE I reloaded for it. So I wont be reloading a lot for it. Thanks for your time Ranch Dog. You know I appreciate all you have done with this website, but I want to reiterate it again.
I won't know how well they shoot until I reload a few more of each and take them out to 75 or 100 yards. I am trying to take "baby steps". My Enfield really stretches brass, and had a case head separation on the 2nd re-loading of mild loads. Good thing I bought the removal tool BEFORE I reloaded for it. So I wont be reloading a lot for it. Thanks for your time Ranch Dog. You know I appreciate all you have done with this website, but I want to reiterate it again.
Reduce, reuse, recycle, means- resize, reload, recycle.
- Ranch Dog
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: 22 Jun 2013 17:16
- My Press Choice: Progressive
- Location: Inez, TX
- Has thanked: 1617 times
- Been thanked: 2851 times
Re: 7.62X54R Powder selection Question
You're welcome and thank you for comments.JohnnyEnfield wrote:Thanks for your time Ranch Dog. You know I appreciate all you have done with this website, but I want to reiterate it again.
I will get on this, but probably not until early morning.
Michael
- Ranch Dog
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: 22 Jun 2013 17:16
- My Press Choice: Progressive
- Location: Inez, TX
- Has thanked: 1617 times
- Been thanked: 2851 times
Re: 7.62X54R Powder selection Question
It looks like it is a great powder with the 7.62x54 from what I see. With the specifics, you have given me...
As with any load suggestions, start 10% below the max charge and work up to that max in increments at your own risk.
- 54.6-grains
- 100% case fill
- 100% burnt before it leaves a 22" barrel
- 2622 FPS @ 70°
- 49.0K PSI
- 53.8-grains
- 100% case fill
- 100% burntl
- 2552 FPS
- 45.9K PSI
As with any load suggestions, start 10% below the max charge and work up to that max in increments at your own risk.
Michael
- Macd
- Supporter
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: 16 Oct 2017 16:12
- My Press Choice: Single Stage
- Location: Far East
- Has thanked: 362 times
- Been thanked: 403 times
Re: 7.62X54R Powder selection Question
HV100 is a great med-slow powder and as the QL predictions indicate a good choice in the 7.62x54R. My M91/30 with it's 29 inch barrel with a .312 groove diameter gives great results with HV100 under a 180 grain jacketed .311 Speer bullet that I also use in my .303. Both IMR and H4350 will also give good results. In fact, in my limited experience, any of the powders that work well in the 30-06 seem (reduced by at least 2 grains to start) to also work out in the "Russian". Having said this it is always better to use due care and thoroughly research loads before committing yourself.
- JohnnyEnfield
- Supporter
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 08 Dec 2017 20:24
- My Press Choice: Single Stage
- Location: Northeast USA
- Has thanked: 176 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
Re: 7.62X54R Powder selection Question
Hi Ranch dog, the Missouri bullet 167 grain #1 Russian groove less, length measures between .900 and .910. Many were .908. I was somewhat surprised as I measured -but that is what I got repeatedly. Interesting numbers on the 180 grain, I had calculated 49.0 grains as a safe starting load, so I am glad I was not too far off, though I never tried a load of it yet. Thank you for the precise numbers and the bullet depths.
I can't wait to make some starting loads. I appreciate Macd commenting as well. I am glad I was thinking clearly and understanding what I have read and learned so far. Thing is, you can never be too careful. So thanks again. I love reloading. Not sure I will cast for rifles ever, but I may. I love reloading and casting. I guess it is better to be careful than ruin a gun or worse.
I can't wait to make some starting loads. I appreciate Macd commenting as well. I am glad I was thinking clearly and understanding what I have read and learned so far. Thing is, you can never be too careful. So thanks again. I love reloading. Not sure I will cast for rifles ever, but I may. I love reloading and casting. I guess it is better to be careful than ruin a gun or worse.
Reduce, reuse, recycle, means- resize, reload, recycle.
- Ranch Dog
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: 22 Jun 2013 17:16
- My Press Choice: Progressive
- Location: Inez, TX
- Has thanked: 1617 times
- Been thanked: 2851 times
Re: 7.62X54R Powder selection Question
Okay, here is some H100V data for your cast bullet. In that, I want to give you something useful and from my experience, it is hard for a lead, gas check bullet to survive beyond 42.0K PSI so that is the first data. You Missouri bullets are not checked so I don't they will survive this pressure.
- 2.594" Cartridge OAL
- Bullet seated .430"
- 49.7-grains
- 100% case fill
- 96% burnt
- 2495 FPS
- 42.0K PSI
- 2.594" Cartridge OAL
- Bullet seated .430"
- 46.0-grains
- 96% case fill
- 92% burnt
- 2294 FPS
- 30.0K PSI
Michael
- GasGuzzler
- Moderator & Supporter
- Posts: 2045
- Joined: 26 Jan 2016 22:39
- My Press Choice: Turret
- Location: Cooke County, TX
- Has thanked: 330 times
- Been thanked: 501 times
Re: 7.62X54R Powder selection Question
There's no flies on that second cast load.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from goin' insane.
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from goin' insane.