Page 3 of 3
Re: Interesting numbers loading 7mm mag
Posted: 20 Oct 2018 06:35
by Ranch Dog
GasGuzzler wrote:Before yesterday the last post was in January.
And you wonder why I auto close old topics?
Fat Albert wrote:I hate to be a NIT picker but what cartridge are you talking about?
I think it is very simple, there is only one real 7mm Magnum; the Remington. All the others, including those introduced by Remington, need characters & numbers to qualify/quantify themselves.
Re: Interesting numbers loading 7mm mag
Posted: 21 Oct 2018 03:24
by GasGuzzler
I don't wonder in general but there are times when a reply after such a long time is actually appropriate....just not very often at all. Got to roll with averages. Auto-close didn't save this one.
Re: Interesting numbers loading 7mm mag
Posted: 21 Oct 2018 05:19
by Ranch Dog
GasGuzzler wrote:Got to roll with averages. Auto-close didn't save this one.
It will now. I went back to the recommended 9 month interval that I was running rather than a year that I had adjusted the feature to.
Re: Interesting numbers loading 7mm mag
Posted: 16 Jan 2019 11:26
by horseman
I'll hit this "dead horse" one more time to end it. It was the bullets....as RD mentioned at the first, they're to "fat"....thanks all.