cartridge length

Discussions covering the components and techniques of reloading for your handgun.
User avatar
Macd
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1009
Joined: 16 Oct 2017 16:12
My Press Choice: Single Stage
Location: Far East
Has thanked: 362 times
Been thanked: 403 times

Re: cartridge length

Post by Macd »

The bullet length reported for the 125 XTPFP is 0.547. The 125 XTPHP is listed as .558. That is a difference 0.011. The FP Loaded .003 short than specified for the HP is actually means less seated depth. My computer with Quickload installed is undergoing an upgrade so I can't double check the data is correctly copied.

Here is the link to the forum I referred to in an earlier post.

http://www.shootforum.com/forum/bulletdb.html

I also note that you are shooting the 38 special load in a .357 magnum revolver. Lots of pressure room for a 38 load in that revolver. Max load for regular 38 is 17,000 psi, 38+P 20,000 and 38+P+ is 22,000 psi. The 357 mag maxs at 35,000 psi
mikld
Founding Member & Supporter
Founding Member & Supporter
Posts: 674
Joined: 30 Jun 2013 09:30
My Press Choice: Turret
Location: S. Oregun
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 371 times

Re: cartridge length

Post by mikld »

Well here's an other "I do this..." post. I determine my OAL in a few different ways. For revolver bullet seating I seat to the cannalure/crimp groove and disregard book OAL. Most bullet designers are smarter than I am and the crimp groove/cannalure is located in the proper place. For my semi-autos I'll start with close to the book OAL and use the plunk test to "tweek" the OAL, often starting long and shortening if necessary. For my rifles I'll go with the manufacturer's recommendation for their specific bullet's OAL. I will stay with mfg. OAL for all the load work up and last, if necessary work on seating depth/distance to lands. I also think the OAL listed in a manual is what the lab used, and not necessarily the optimum measurement. (I record all pertinent info/dimensions so I only have to determine what works once).

I may be wrong but I think a reloading manual tell us; "here's the industry standard, and here's what we used in our listed equipment".
Ohio3Wheels
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 888
Joined: 06 Mar 2016 16:09
My Press Choice: Hand Press
Location: SW Ohio
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 240 times

Re: cartridge length

Post by Ohio3Wheels »

mikld wrote:snip

I may be wrong but I think a reloading manual tell us; "here's the industry standard, and here's what we used in our listed equipment".
My thoughts on that are very much the same. The vast majority of the data is collected using the world famous universal receiver. That's a good thing I think. If most all manufactures use the same equipment we have a chance that some variables have been eliminated from the process.

Make smoke,
Curt.......makin' smoke and raising my carbon foot print one cartridge at a time +guns +guns
User avatar
Old Scribe
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 369
Joined: 02 May 2015 09:13
My Press Choice: Turret
Location: State of Jefferson
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 120 times

Re: cartridge length

Post by Old Scribe »

Yep. I watch the OAL closely in my rifle reloading. I agree what milkld posted about the folks manufacturing bullets. My revolver bullets with a cannelure are crimped at the grove. Never had a problem.
"Well here's another nice mess you've gotten me into." Oliver Hardy
horseman
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 999
Joined: 09 Nov 2015 06:35
My Press Choice: Single Stage
Location: Washington State
Has thanked: 37 times
Been thanked: 274 times

Re: cartridge length

Post by horseman »

COAL in your reloading manual is as stated previously. It's the length that "they" used for that particular loading. They're "guidelines" for handloaders. The true maximum COAL length for revolvers is the length of the cylinder, for any weapon with a magazine then that's the "maximum" and for a rifle it is the length of the chamber, lever guns is what it will feed. That doesn't mean these are the "best" lengths but that would be the "maximum". As far as increased pressure or less pressure with COAL"s, like in most things reloading "it depends".....but as a blanket statement that this is what happens isn't necessarily true.
larryw
Founding Member & Supporter
Founding Member & Supporter
Posts: 1123
Joined: 20 Dec 2013 11:09
My Press Choice: Single Stage
Location: Arizona
Location: Arizona
Has thanked: 688 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Re: cartridge length

Post by larryw »

+1 Very well said Horseman.
A day late & A dollar short? Story of my life +guns
User avatar
Macd
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1009
Joined: 16 Oct 2017 16:12
My Press Choice: Single Stage
Location: Far East
Has thanked: 362 times
Been thanked: 403 times

Re: cartridge length

Post by Macd »

horseman wrote:COAL in your reloading manual is as stated previously. It's the length that "they" used for that particular loading. They're "guidelines" for handloaders. The true maximum COAL length for revolvers is the length of the cylinder, for any weapon with a magazine then that's the "maximum" and for a rifle it is the length of the chamber, lever guns is what it will feed. That doesn't mean these are the "best" lengths but that would be the "maximum". As far as increased pressure or less pressure with COAL"s, like in most things reloading "it depends".....but as a blanket statement that this is what happens isn't necessarily true.
There are exceptions to every general statement and I agree this applies also to reloading. The new reloader should follow the general rule until they have sufficient knowledge and experience to deviate. COL in almost all situations will affect peak pressure. How much depends on many other variables. Can it make a load unsafe? Yes, in some combinations. Can it affect consistency in FPS and accuracy? Yes, again depending on other load characteristics. Is it a linear relationship. No, but I think we can all agree it is an important one for the handloader to learn about and respect.
Post Reply

Return to “Handgun Reloading”