My wild guess is that for that one round for whatever reason you didn't pull the arm all the way down/ram all the way up so it seated a bit long. Did someone or something interrupt you while you were running this test?Steve wrote:I don't know what happened to give me that 1 at 1.140" It is pretty rare for me to have one this far off.
Seating Depth And Case Expansion Change During Production
- 6Gears1Speed
- Posts: 123
- Joined: 10 Dec 2014 12:01
- My Press Choice: Progressive
- Location: Boston Area
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Seating Depth And Case Expansion Change During Productio
-
- Founding Member & Supporter
- Posts: 1099
- Joined: 21 Jan 2014 20:57
- My Press Choice: Progressive
- Location: Eastern Iowa
- Has thanked: 182 times
- Been thanked: 357 times
Re: Seating Depth And Case Expansion Change During Productio
Negative on the interruption. I should have checked the bullet when I found the cartridge was long. My seating plug fits the ogave/taper of the bullet. What I have found in the past was bullets that were maybe cold when cast so they didn't fill out the seating plug which lets the tip extend further. Usually my cartridges stay within 3 thousandths.6Gears1Speed wrote:My wild guess is that for that one round for whatever reason you didn't pull the arm all the way down/ram all the way up so it seated a bit long. Did someone or something interrupt you while you were running this test?Steve wrote:I don't know what happened to give me that 1 at 1.140" It is pretty rare for me to have one this far off.
- Fyodor
- Founding Member & Supporter
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: 04 Jan 2014 05:45
- My Press Choice: Progressive
- Location: Gernsbach, Germany
- Has thanked: 794 times
- Been thanked: 504 times
Re: Seating Depth And Case Expansion Change During Productio
Do you measure on the same spot that your seating plug touches?
If you seat on the taper, but measure on the top, a slightly different bullet form might end up in a "large" deviation in seating depth. Depending on the angle of the taper, it acts as a kind of "gear" with an transmission ratio equal to the cone ratio. In an extreme case even casting temperature could have an influence there, because the shrinkage is different.
Try making an adaptor ring for your caliper, so you measure the same spot that you seat. Otherwise you don't measure what your press and fires are doing only, but also some other influences that you don't know.
If you seat on the taper, but measure on the top, a slightly different bullet form might end up in a "large" deviation in seating depth. Depending on the angle of the taper, it acts as a kind of "gear" with an transmission ratio equal to the cone ratio. In an extreme case even casting temperature could have an influence there, because the shrinkage is different.
Try making an adaptor ring for your caliper, so you measure the same spot that you seat. Otherwise you don't measure what your press and fires are doing only, but also some other influences that you don't know.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
- Evelyn Beatrice Hall, often misattributed to Voltaire
I think I'm thinking, therefore I may possibly be.
- Evelyn Beatrice Hall, often misattributed to Voltaire
I think I'm thinking, therefore I may possibly be.
-
- Founding Member & Supporter
- Posts: 1099
- Joined: 21 Jan 2014 20:57
- My Press Choice: Progressive
- Location: Eastern Iowa
- Has thanked: 182 times
- Been thanked: 357 times
Re: Seating Depth And Case Expansion Change During Productio
You are 100% correct Fyodor. When I measure using the method you describe the length when using once fired good condition cases the measurement stays within 1 thousandth.Fyodor wrote:Do you measure on the same spot that your seating plug touches?
If you seat on the taper, but measure on the top, a slightly different bullet form might end up in a "large" deviation in seating depth. Depending on the angle of the taper, it acts as a kind of "gear" with an transmission ratio equal to the cone ratio. In an extreme case even casting temperature could have an influence there, because the shrinkage is different.
Try making an adaptor ring for your caliper, so you measure the same spot that you seat. Otherwise you don't measure what your press and fires are doing only, but also some other influences that you don't know.
But if my OAL exceeds 1.140 by not much I have feed problems in my M&P. So I think the variance in OAL I do have with these cast bullets basically says the bullet quality is vary high. I load 223 Remington on the Loadmaster using a 3 point contact with dies. With good quality bullets, and good matched cases the 223 does not vary when measured on the ogave of the bullet.